Los Angeles County

Biographies


 

 

GEORGE EDWIN BURNELL

 

 

BURNELL, GEORGE EDWIN, Philosopher, Los Angeles, California, was born in Hartford, Connecticut, July 9, 1863, the son of Edwin Burnell and Mary (Malloy) Burnell. He married Mary Irene Lamoreaux at Chicago, Illinois, November 11, 1891, and to them was born a daughter, Genevieve Mary Burnell.

            Mr. Burnell, who is known today in all parts of the world as one of the leading thinkers of modern times, received his practical education in the schools of Minneapolis and Chicago. He was graduated from the High School of the former city and then went to the University of Minnesota, from which he was graduated with the degree of B. L. Following this, Mr. Burnell went to Chicago, where he entered Morgan Park Theological Seminary, with the intention of studying for the ministry. He was a student there under the late Dr. William R. Harper, the noted educator who closed his career as President of Chicago University. Mr. Burnell also studied at the Union Theological Seminary of Chicago, and while there devoted much time to the study of the so-called dead languages, such as Hebrew and Sanscrit.

            For more than twenty-five years Mr. Burnell has devoted himself to a study of metaphysical subjects, with particular attention to an interpretation of Sacred Literature. His views on this latter subject have found expression in a series of remarkable lectures, covering a diversity of subjects which he has treated in a manner so original as to attract the attention of scholars throughout the world. He was first brought to public notice when, as a high school student, he was called upon to deliver an oration on the assassination of President James A. Garfield. His point of view and method of thought expression, even at that early age, made him an object of wonder to savants.

            The versatility of his mental processes and his prolific ability have increased steadily since that time, until today there are of record more than one thousand reports on various subjects which he has discussed in his lectures. To enumerate all of these would require a volume of space, but a few of the lecture subjects will serve to indicate the power and extent of Mr. Burnell’s philosophical researches. Among them are:

            Administry,” “Aphorism XV: Science of Faith”; “Challenge: Chargement of Soul”; “Churning: Aryan Justice Classic”; “Crucifixion: Cosmic Tragedy”; “Grail Cup: Tragedy of England”; “Hamlet: Study in Insanity”; “Jalalud Din: Dynamic Man”; “Meditation: Isolation”; “Merlin: Gospel of Adventure”; “Nibblers: Mental Lockjaw”; “Parsifal: Summoning Innocence”; “Prophets: Their Biological Value”; “Pentecost: Only in Word Is God”; “Static Theatre: Message of Drama”; “Vyasa: The Immortal.”

            His serial lectures, or groups of thought under general subjects, include:

            “Experience,” “Freedom of Life,” “Immortals,” “Minerva,” “Omar Khayyam,” “Religion,” “Tragedy,” “Healing,” “Intellect,” “Mountain,” “Parables,” “Rocking Stone,” “Samaritanism,” “Wealth,” “Authority,” “Intelligence,” “Intuitional Areas,” “Luminous Areas,” “Meditation,” “Rational Empire,” “Super-World,” “Virtue,” “Super-Classics,” “Super-Justice,” “Volitional Empire,” “Super-Jurisprudence,” “Aggression,” “Flambeaux,” “Ens Rationis.”

            These latter series include original discussion and interpretation of practically every phase of the title subjects. Some of them, like “Flambeaux,” include two hundred separate and distinct treatments of the original subject.

            In his study of these many subjects Mr. Burnell has followed no previous school of philosophy, having read the teachings of practically all the great thinkers of history and then placed his own interpretation upon the subject at hand. He has not confined his investigations to religious matters, although his reasonings in this particular field have caused him to be placed on an eminence in the world of modern letters. An indication of his method of reasoning is found in one of his lectures, which belongs to the group “Ens Rationis” and bears the general title, “Lordly Residence.” This is subdivided into two parts, namely: “Another Abode Than Space” and “Refuge for the Released.”

            His thought in the first part takes the line that “space is an entity of origin instead of an eternal, infinite being.” He then proceeds to explain that all things material dwell in the soul, rather than the soul being a part of them, and asserts that the soul, having always existed and being everlasting, is the only real abiding place.

            At one point he says:

            “The Supreme Person, the only person there is, a veritable personality, a form, a shape, who created space and the mind and all beings upon the ground, and placed the sun and the moon and the stars, is never visible to any being in this creation, with one definite, simple, provided exception. Suppose a certain strong, irresistible mind should create a personal being that was just like himself, and surround him with a supposed environment, and shut him into that by the faculties of his own mind, established upon certain laws that would definitely force him to move in the limits interminably of that creation: For such a being there would be no rational possibility of escape. He could not by any chance break away from that creation, because there would be nothing to him different from that creation by virtue of which he could break away from it. If, on the other hand, this strong, irresistible person should himself, with his own irresistible and strong mind, establish somewhere in the created personality of this being, or in any one of the beings with which this created entity supposed himself to be associated, or in any of the objects which were created about him, and this supreme, irresistible person should actually, by his genuine form and person, occupy this state of mind or creation, at that point would be a possible escape. Had there been no such arrangement in this world, in this universe, there would never have been any doctrine of escape at all. All there would have been would consist in a sense of advancing from one form or orbit of experience to another, in the sense of betterment in the sense of amelioration.

            “Most human beings, however much they struggle for truth, find it difficult to relieve themselves of the feeling that they must change into a better state before they can be hopeful of the supreme advantage of insight and emancipation. This is because they have not touched that Supreme Person at all, nor do they actually know of that spot in the human person, physical, flesh, or anywhere in the objects of existence which touch actually, the entity that does not need any change, but being what it is, is truth, is emancipate, is complete, is genuine, is all-knowing, all-perfect, eternal, satisfied. Once only actually in touch with that Supreme Person they no longer look upon the truth as a change of worlds, as a betterment of life, as an amelioration of conditions, as an advantage or disadvantage, or any other explanation that concerns good and evil, right and wrong, up and down, in and out, or any of the arts of opposition.

            “Now, as a matter of actual fact, there does exist in the person, the real form of every entity in the universe, this genuine, unchangeable being, who is the strong, irresistible mind, who is the abode of Heaven and earth and sky and mind and all objects, subjective and gross. Human beings are in the habit of thinking themselves to be certain persons with certain attachments, responsibilities, conditions, forms, by virtue of which they are distinguished and known by name, locality, time. Their birth, their place of residence, whom they belong with, their associates, their general appearance constitute and make up their experiential sanity. But this self that does actually reside forever in the genuine residence contains them, and lives, containing the whole universe, in actual substance and form, in their own body.

            “The debate arose because the location of this Supreme Person was so definitely described that the text of the description seemed to inevitably infer that it must be the individual, separate self that was referred to, instead of the Supreme Person. For the text says:

 

“‘Where like spokes in the nave of a wheel the arteries meet,

He moves about becoming manifold.

 

“‘He moves about becoming manifold

Within the heart, where the arteries meet,

Like spokes fastened to the nave.

Meditate on that Self!

Hail to you,

That you may cross beyond the sea of darkness.’

 

            “Now, the description was so definite in the person of flesh that the debate arose, and prolonged in discussion and led out into interminable histories, that this self, this eternal self located beside the arteries of the flesh, containing all the worlds and the Heavens, must be the separate self that was by some process of association with worlds and experience to learn how to contain and dominate all things.

            “If a person lacks sanction in bettering himself, he secures it by a sympathetic sense of bettering others; but he does not come any nearer to that eternal self, concerning whom there is no approach or falling away. But this very self, near to the arteries of the heart, contained and is not contained, is the abode of the Universe, the sun and the moon and the stars, and of all beings; is not upon any journey, but is forever still; does not have to overcome space to secure a sense of permanent residence; does not have to overcome time in order to be released from that continual procrastination which the orbits of things seduce.”

            One of the important lectures by Mr. Burnell, and one in which he told his listeners frankly what he thought of them, analyzing their mental attitudes in great detail, was entitled “Nibblers: Medicine for Mental Lockjaw Applied.” In part, he said:

            “I can almost tell the nibbler by looking at him – and some of them are here. But that is not the particular point about it. The particular point is, they cannot open their mouths and bite. They have lockjaw of the soul.   *  *  *

            “It is stated that the truth which is proposed by this teaching is not offering any human being a remedy for his condition. He is supposed to approach it under the auspices of the idea that his condition, physical mental, is not such that the only infinite truth, the eternal God, could condescend to remedy. Patchiness – ethical training, religious fervor, cultures and symbolism, the reading of the poets – emancipations from prejudices, that occur through associations with material investigations, which we are obviously in the presence of testimony sufficient to prove that individuals in such associations attain to certain mental maturities, – how can I say it to you, that such maturings are worthless? How can I say it to you that faithfulness and devotion are blasphemy? How can I say it to you so that you will see that everything you do to become what you are is an insult to what you are?

            “And how can I say it so that you will get done with this mental meandering, this prowling and browsing? When will you stop, and not wait for the Sphinx to petrify you with dismay? What shall I say to you that there can come an evanishment to your career of failure? What can I say? Think you that that omnipotent soul and omniscience within you cares for your mediocre surrenderings, your wages in meditation, and presentation of yourself to the teaching and all the several things you do every moment in your life to win a little better credit with your own mental premises, as if you should appoint unto yourself a path and then pat yourself on the back for walking in it for the sake of an accumulation of approval? Is it not insanity? – set yourself a stunt, accomplish it and sing your applause! And the eternal soul says, ‘I am against thee and all thy progress.’ For the simple reason that the truth is what you are – not what you are going to make yourself; not even what you are going to discover yourself to be.

            “Omniscience is not on a journey of discovery. Then, you say: ‘What is this that has cheated me so that I should think so differently of myself, so unsatisfactorily.’ What? Because you cannot stand it to have somebody who knows, walk up to you and ‘twist you around’, as Plato says, ‘in that violent and criminal fashion that is required.’ Plato used to say – and he was a very mild man, not a violent man at all, and he said: ‘Not one of the walking images of their own estimation, not one of these painted pictures on their cosmic airs, looking at their own opinions, at their own convictions and certainties, doing devotion to their own laws and prejudices and imprisonments, not one of them shall ever have escape from the case in which he has secreted himself, until there shall come along one magnificent, reckless, ruthless awakened soul that will tear him from the socket of his hypnotism.’

            “Listen! Awakening from mental prejudice is surgical, – the birth-pains thereof. I know where the arnica box is; I know where the chloroform bottle is. Ten million are taking mental chloroform in the United States now. Why? Because they were prescient of the birth-pangs of their mind. How many people, let me ask you, how many people out of these ten million are going to enter into the new mind-born race?   *  *  *

            “I will tell you something now: That unless you are going to get somebody to wring the neck of your estimates, the great figures of the elements and the astral busy-bodies will know what to do with you. That is not a threat. That is just reading your own mind – that is all. That is reading your own covenant. You signed a covenant with the elements of this world, also with the elements of your mind, that if you did not attain immortality you would be distributed, for beings who would, beings yet unborn. Why, then, should I talk to you? Know that in the world, unless so be that you have sincerely, in the depths of your soul, signed a covenant with the truth, signed a covenant in the very blood of your will with the truth, – what truth? THE truth. You do not even know of it. It is buying a cat in a bag for ignorance to covenant with truth when in the conviction that they do not know the truth.

            “Let me tell you a little psychological fact: Suppose you do not know what the truth is at all – you have just heard the word; you have heard certain psychological symptoms advertised as being characteristic of those who have the truth; that is, that they will be able to heal the sick, raise the dead, and do those little items; characterized by certain marvelous astonishing behaviors, – but supposing on the strength of that advertisement, which seems so grand and so great, like as if it would say to you, ‘If you know the truth you shall escape all evil, the very universe will crawl to you and offer its services to you like a slave’.

            “That is quite an advertisement, you see, and the more ignorant you are the more the advertisement takes. Listen! Suppose you have accepted on that advertisement and you have some difficulties you would like to have settled up, – maybe your bodies are occupied by one of these infestations called disease; maybe your affairs are rather crumbling and disappointing; whatever it is, the advertisement of the knowledge of the truth reaches you and appeals to you not only on the ground that it is the truth, but on the ground of your greed.   *  *  *

            “This is the one thing that I wish to say to you: If you can think of anything to say to yourself that will distress you, say it. It is very awakening, don’t you know. I suppose that the device of evil as a total unreality is most excellent. Destroyed in the awakening. I will recommend, therefore, this one thing to you that even though you carry with you the conviction that you are an ignorant being, not yet born in the mind, so that when you are even, say, a mind-born man or woman you can hardly contemplate the meaning of it, so convinced are you of what it is to be a sense-born being, existing in the several items of human experience that are credentialed to you by the senses; that is, a sense-born being. And when we say mind-born, your mind bats its eyes and blinks and wonders about what divine thing that may be.   *  *  *

            “There is a tremendous stream of mental refreshment flowing throughout the civilized world. These are days, great days, and history shall busy itself with the most stupendous intellects that the cosmos can furnish. See that you stand in with that imminent and almost inevitable possibility of being born mentally. I say therefore, this: Keep your mind in the atmosphere of liberty. Do not contract any covenants with any of the propositions which your ignorance shall suggest; and when that mind opens its mouth to breathe for the first time the airs of its life, it shall find about you and within you a magnetism of freedom, an atmosphere of freedom, so beautiful to its new, dawning existence. The mind-born people of these states shall be pre-eminent in the several years that are immediately to come; and those who do not receive this quickening of the mind shall become as animals in the presence of this kingly race.”

            Mr. Burnell’s philosophy deals with the belief that the realization of truth will be the solution of the problems which beset mankind and that this solution cannot be brought about through the laboratory method of the scientists.

            Mr. Burnell, in his life of study and investigation, has been a searcher for truth and his teachings, while not in the form of dogma, have spread to the corners of the earth by their own momentum; for among his listeners are some of the most serious-minded men and women of the world today. While not in any sense a cult, his followers have taken his messages as the results of sincere effort to interpret and explain higher problems of existence. In all of his researches he has had the sympathetic aid of his wife, who is a student quite as sincere and successful as himself.

            Although he has been a student all his life, Mr. Burnell, an independently wealthy man, has also been successful in practical lines of business endeavor. In 1889, when he was attending college in Chicago, he, in partnership with a schoolmate, participated in a realty operation that netted them a large profit. This particular accomplishment involved the opening of Auburn Park, a suburb of Chicago.

            When he located in California several years ago, Mr. Burnell became interested in the development of farming lands as an investor and is today an officer and stockholder in several corporations engaged in this business. They include the California Irrigated Farms Company, of which he is President and Director; the San Joaquin Farms Company, of which he is President and Director, and the Rich Groves Land Company, in which he holds similar office.

            Another phase of the man is that of clergyman. Although he never affiliated with any church, he is a qualified minister, having been licensed to preach and to perform other ministerial offices by the Supreme Court of Minnesota.

            He is a Phi Delta Theta man and a member of several clubs, including the California Club, Los Angeles Country Club, Jonathan Club, Los Angeles Athletic Club and the Olympic Club of San Francisco. His outdoor recreation is obtained from golf.

           

 

 

Transcribed by Marie Hassard 20 May 2011.

Source: Press Reference Library, Western Edition Notables of the West, Vol. I, Pages 679-681, International News Service, New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Boston, Atlanta.  1913.


© 2011 Marie Hassard.

 

 

 

GOLDEN NUGGET'S LOS ANGELES BIOGRAPIES 

GOLDEN NUGGET INDEX