THE ARGONAUTS OF CALIFORNIA.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 348.

 

CHAPTER XXIV.

 

THE RETURN--GREAT CHANGES.

 

Jo.--Good morning, William, how do you do?

      William--Very well, very well, I thank you, but you have the advantage of me, sir.

      Jo.--Why; don’t you remember Jo, your old chum?

      W.--What! Is this Jo? Is it possible? So it is, so it is. When did you arrive from California?

      Jo.--I have just arrived.

      W.--Did you return by water, Jo?

      Jo.--Oh, no! I came by rail across the continent.

      W.--Well, I suppose there are a great many of the boys of ‘49 still living in California and intending to end their days there, are there not?

      Jo.--Oh, yes, there are several thousand remaining upon the Pacific Coast, and they all seem contented with their new homes.

      W.--Well, how many are there now living of the Forty-niners; have you any idea, Jo?

      Jo.--Judging from the number of those who are now living who joined the Pioneer Association in the various States, there must be at least about 15,000.

      W.--Well, that was a grand and pleasant adventure, the departure of so many thousands for the other side of the continent to search for gold, wasn’t it? And I suppose you boys all enjoyed it, too and profited by the experience?

      Jo.--Yes, we certainly did, and I doubt if there was ever in the history of the world an adventure similar in character and magnitude, and which created such wonderful effects as the gold discovery of California, for as far as our observation extends, the existence of such another vast gold field is improbable, unless it may be that in the unexplored regions of Africa rich gold fields may exist, but even if such discoveries should be made, such are the numbers and

 

Page 349. Illustration.

 

Page 350.

 

character of the savage tribes that inhabit those regions, they would be of little value to the civilized world.

      W.--Well, I suppose you observe the great changes that have taken place here upon this side of the continent since you left forty years ago?

      Jo.--Yes, indeed, I do, and ‘tis difficult to realize the great changes that have taken place in so short a space of time, and which are visible when crossing the continent from Hangtown to Jersey, for towns and cities have sprung into existence, and sections of the country are now thickly populated where but a few short years ago were barren desert places, occupied only by roving bands of savages. And all of these changed conditions are due to the gold discovery in California.

      W.--Yes, yes, you are right, and it was the means also, through the energy of you gold diggers, of building up a great and prosperous country upon the other side of the continent, as well as producing a condition of prosperity over the entire country. But, Jo, I want you to tell me why it is that so few of you old pioneers succeeded in your expectations of obtaining great wealth in a country where so much gold was dug from the earth, for it seems to me that you are the ones who should have been the most successful.

      Jo.--Yes, it does seem so, but if we did not succeed in holding on to what we dug from the earth, at any rate we have the satisfaction of knowing that our friends here in the East got their share of it in the course of their business transactions.

      W.--Oh, well, that’s very generous of you old miners, and no doubt is a great satisfaction.

      Jo.--Yes, and I hope you received your share; did you not?

      W.--Oh, well, yes, yes, moderately! Only moderately so; but then I’ve no cause to complain; no cause to complain. But tell me, Jo, why it was that you boys who dug it out of the earth didn’t keep your share, too?

      Jo.--That I will endeavor to do if you will explain to me why it was that after we had dug it from the earth, and had shipped it to you here in the East by the ton, so small a portion of you succeeded in getting a share of it?

      W.--Does the idea seem to strike you that our great prosperity here is not general, and that only a small portion of us are enjoying the advantages of the great gold circulation.

 

 

Page 351.

 

      Jo.--Yes, from all the evidence, with a money circulation of nearly fifteen hundred millions of gold that has been sent to you here at the East, there does not appear to exist a general prosperity, for the strikes, the great labor organizations, and the various theories adopted by your agitators and explained from the platform are evidence of the fact that a great portion, at least, do not share in the general prosperity. Now, why is this?

      W.--Well, I must admit that such is really the case, and that there should exist so much poverty with such a great money circulation is difficult of comprehension. Can you explain the phenomenon, Jo?

      Jo.--Hardly, William, for you know that it is the business of the miner to dig the gold from the earth only, and for the business men of the country, who use it, to devise the proper means for its use and distribution.

      W.--Yes, that is true enough, true enough; and that it is not equally distributed, and that all portions of our country and persons do not share in the use and possession of it, is, in my opinion, an evidence that the conditions created by the improper use of it are not well understood. Is that your opinion?

      Jo.--That may be possible. Will you explain further?

      W.--Yes. All of these dissensions that exist among us, such as the land-reform agitators, the socialist and the labor organizations, strikes, the anarchist with his bomb, as well as the inclination to monkey with dynamite generally, by a certain class of men, are but the effects (indirectly, perhaps), of the great amount of our gold circulation.

      Jo.--I see, William, that you still entertain the same old Puritanical notions of too much money, and all of our labor has been in vain, then.

      W.--Oh, no, your labor has not been in vain, Jo. Send us all the gold from California that you possibly can, for the annual yield from your mines is hardly sufficient now to make up for wear and tear, and for what is sent to foreign countries. What I mean is, that there is too much gold in circulation to the ratio of silver, for the general good.

      Jo.--Then, in your opinion, if there was a greater amount of silver in circulation to the ratio of gold it would change these unnatural conditions that now exist?

 

Page 352.

 

      W. - Yes, I most certainly do, Jo.

      Jo.--Will you explain why?

      W.--Well, observation shows that the great bulk of the gold from California seems to concentrate in the chief towns and cities. Now this, of course, is to the advantage of the bankers and capitalists generally, and is the chief reason why that class of men advocate the single standard. Now ‘tis plain to see the effect of this, for we all have a desire to obtain gold, and it was that reason, and to satisfy that desire, that sent thousands of you boys around Cape Horn and across the barren deserts to California, was it not?

      Jo.--Well, yes, that was the cause.

      W.--And with the desire to acquire wealth in the easiest and quickest manner possible, and with the least labor, now wasn’t that the idea, Jo?

      Jo.--That was our idea of it, William.

      W.--Well since the greater portion of the gold from your mines flows into the towns and chief cities, and to linger there, and since all have the desire to get a share of it in the easiest and quickest manner, and with as little exertion as possible, it is therefore evident that in order to do so, it was necessary to go into the towns and cities after it, was it not?

      Jo.--That must be the conclusion.

      W.--Now this increased gold circulation had the effect of stimulating all the various industries; this created a demand for labor, raised the price of it, and brought to our shores the surplus laborers of Europe who desired to get their share of it, but this was not all, Jo, for the laborers of the farming districts all over the country rushed into the big cities also, and these are the evil effects produced. Why, you ask? Because this concentration of labor from foreign lands and from the agricultural districts into our great cities created an over supply of labor which is the direct cause of all these dissensions among us. Now don’t you have that idea of it, Jo?

      Jo.--Well, perhaps you are right, and in your opinion the circulation of silver to an amount equal to gold will remedy the evil, is that it?

      W.--Yes, yes, but don’t speak too loud or my associates in the bank over there may overhear our conversation, and censure me for holding opinions and advocating a policy that would be rather detrimental to our business.

 

 

Page 353.

 

      Jo.--What! You a banker, William?

      W.--Oh, yes, in a small way.

      Jo.--Well, then, I can return your compliment by saying that it is very generous in you to advocate a policy for the general good that would be detrimental to your business.

      W.--Yes, yes, but I think the time is soon coming when ‘twill be necessary to adopt such a policy, for the present gold circulation is bringing into existence such a state of affairs that a reaction must, from the nature of things, take place. But I do not wish you to infer, Jo, that the great abundance of gold that you miners have sent us has been the direct cause of such unnatural conditions; by no means, but it is in the manner of using it. Now you know that if you should spread upon some barren sandy spot certain fertilizing substances, with a little water, and fail to properly prepare and cultivate the ground, that weeds and poisonous plants will come into existence upon the spot, these plants are entirely useless, perhaps, but this fact does not prove that the fertilizing substance was an injury by any means, but only that it was improperly used, and just so it is with gold and silver. These metals are the fertilizers for all human industries, and the various socialist theories, labor organizations, strikes, etc., are the obnoxious weeds brought into existence by its improper use. Now, am I not right, Jo.?

      Jo.--That may be the case, but, please tell me, William, why the greater circulation of silver will change such conditions.

      Wm.--Well, for the reasons that silver will circulate more freely among the working classes, and also in the country among the small villages and farmers.

      Jo.--Can you give good reasons why silver would circulate more freely, and to a much greater extent in the agricultural districts than gold?

      Wm.--Certainly, certainly I can; for the reason why gold concentrates into the great centers of population is because it can be used to much better advantage by the bankers, brokers and our larger business houses in the cities; it is easier to handle in large sums, requires less space for its storage, and its value being more uniform than silver there is therefore less risk in hoarding it up; these are the principal reasons why a single gold standard is more to the interest of the business community, and to us bankers in particular.

 

 

Page 354.

 

Jo. - Now please explain the effects which will be produced upon the country generally, and how such changed conditions will be created by the circulation of a greater proportion of silver, for even granting, as you maintain, that silver will circulate more freely among the farmers, why will this fact create a change for the better?

 

W. - Well, it is plain, Jo, that the less is the gold in circulation to the ratio of silver the less will be the facilities for acquiring it, for since the bankers, etc., will have little desire to hoard up the latter, the greater will be its circulation, and for this reason will circulate more freely among the working men, as well as among the farming community.

 

Jo. - Well, granting that it will, as you say give to the agricultural districts an increased circulation of money, what good effects are to result?

 

W. - Now, here is just the point, Jo, for is it not plain that our single standard gold circulation has caused very injurious effects upon such remote portions of the country, and which proves that the great prosperity is not general, by any means. That it has built up large cities is very true, as well as transportation facilities, by building thousands of miles of railroads, but how about the farming industry of the country? Should not that also receive its proper share of prosperity enjoyed by the thicker settled portions of the country? I should think so, shouldn’t you, Jo?

 

Jo. - Why, yes, I should certainly think so.

 

W. - Well, but how does the case stand? Whilst a few persons have been enabled to acquire immense wealth in our large cities, the greater portion of our farming lands from Maine to Iowa are heavily mortgaged, and here in the New England States an entire new order of things has been inaugurated, for the sons and daughters of the farmers have gone into the cities in order to acquire wealth by an easier method than farming, and the farming lands, which were almost entirely deserted by the younger ones, are falling into the hands of foreigners, and in some portions of the country at the West it is impossible to procure labor sufficient to harvest the crops. Havn’t you observed this in your traveling about the country, Jo?

 

Jo. - Yes, I have, for only a short time since I visited a district where I once lived, in the State of New York, and I found that about all, who are now living there upon the farms are the old people

 

 

Page 355

 

The younger ones have nearly all gone into the towns and cities to engage in business, to learn trades and professions.  I must say that in the absence of the younger members of the country it gives to it a sad and dreary look, and in some few cases a very desolate appearance for I saw a portion of the country which forty years ago was rich farming land, but such is its condition now that if a resident of the sandy sage-brush lands of Colorado or Utah could be transported and placed upon it, he would feel perfectly contented, and would not pine for his Western home.

      They tell me also that it is almost impossible to obtain assistance to harvest their crops, and in many cases are compelled to send to New York for foreign laborers.  Yes, ‘tis evident, William, that great changes have taken place in the past forty years, at least in this portion of the country.  Whilst visiting that section of the country I met an old lady, a former school-mate, and she spoke of the changes that had taken place in a sad tone.

      “Oh,” she said, “this is not the country that it was in our day, for the young people all leave the farms for the big cities as soon as they get old enough.”

      In answer to my inquiry in relation to a few of my former companions she said :

      “They all went into the towns and cities; some learned to be doctors and some to be lawyers; some one thing and some another.  Do you remember Sam Hobbs ?  Well he got to be head engineer in a sausage factory and made lots of money, and then there is Al Peck; you remember him, of course ?  Well he was up here on a visit a few years ago dressed up in the finest rig, with his gold watch, and diamond pin and things.  He said he was superintendent of a gin-fizz mill, if you know what that is, for I am sure I don’t.  Well, Al is real kind and tender-hearted, for he did sympathize with John so much because he had to rake hay out in the hot sun, then he pitied us all so much, too, because we were compelled to live out here in the country so far from the city, that it was really distressing to hear him.

      “Ah, yes,” she continued, “but those were happy days. What gay times we had in the winter, and how we all did enjoy piling into the big sleigh and going to the singing-schools and parties around the country, as well as to the apple and the husking bees, too.  But all of those pleasant times are past, Jo.  I don’t believe

 

 

Page 356.

 

that you could get enough young men and girls together now around here in the country to start one of them old-fashioned kissing bees.”

      And my old school companion has a good memory, too, William, for she continued by asking:

      “Do you remember, Jo, the husking bee that you had in your father’s big barn? ‘Twas in ‘48, I think, the year before you started for California. I remember well, Jo, how you went the day before and hid away in a handy place a whole bushel of red ears of corn and got more than your share of the fun. How selfish that was in you, wasn’t it, Jo, to go and leave the other boys shivering out in the cold? Oh, well, I suppose you have long since repented of it; havn’t you?”

      I told the old lady that I certainly had, but said I:

      “Mary, although ‘tis a pleasure to recall to mind such pleasing incidents and events of our boyhood days, yet as we advance in years we often have cause to grieve for neglected opportunities in the past, and in recalling to mind the little incident you have mentioned, with its happy surroundings, pretty girls and a bushel of corn, there comes over me a feeling of sadness and of sorrow that I didn’t ----”

      “Didn’t what, Jo? She asked.

      “That I didn’t make it two bushels instead of one,” I answered.

      W.--Well, it is very evident that the conditions under which we are now existing must be changed, for society, as well as the future welfare of our country, demands it.

      Jo.--Well, what is your opinion of the various theories advanced by George, Bellamy and others. Would they not afford relief if adopted?

      W.--That is possible, but a transient relief only, for they do not remove the absolute cause of it all; these remedies advocated by them are to our national, political and social organizations, what the drug of the physician is to the human or physical organization; while they may afford relief, they do not effect a permanent cure, or remove the cause of the disease. Now, according to our present state and condition of affairs, whilst our commercial interests are of first importance, and the building up of our great cities, with their 14 and 16 story buildings the chief aim and consideration, the agricultural interests are entirely overlooked, and rich farming districts

 

 

Page 357.

 

are almost entirely depopulated or occupied by a foreign race. I know that to the great mass of bustling business men in our cities, these facts seem of very trifling importance, but, Jo, what would your gold of California be good for without the products of the soil to give it value, for the value of gold and silver is dependent upon, and determined entirely by, the amount of such productions. Why, Jo, if the wheat crop of the world should from any cause be reduced one-half, the amount of gold in circulation being relatively greater it would consequently be cheaper, and would require a hatful of it to purchase a barrel of flour, and if the crops were an entire failure you couldn’t sell your gold for more than 25 cents a bushel.

      Jo.--I don’t exactly understand why it is, or what possible reason these socialist reformers can have for maintaining that the private ownership of land is the chief cause of the existence of poverty and distress among us, when there are millions of acres of unoccupied lands now open to settlement, with labor in demand in the farming districts, as well as good opportunities for renting, leasing, or for working upon shares good farming lands within a short distance from our large cities.

      W.--Yes, yes, that is all true enough, but these agitators in saying that the private ownership of land is the cause of poverty have no reference whatever, Jo, to farming lands, but only to city lots, for their ideas do not extend beyond the city limits. Why, did you ever hear of one of these men advising the unemployed working men to go into the country, occupy the public lands, and live by the cultivation of the soil? No, you never did.

      Jo.--Well, I suppose that it would be a useless undertaking to try to induce persons, even those who were brought up and raised upon a farm (as no doubt the great majority of the idle men in your cities were), to leave the bustle and excitement of a city life and to live in solitude upon a farm.

      W.--Yes, no doubt it would, and could hardly be expected of them; but the inducements should be such that the rising generation of the farming districts will be satisfied and content to remain there in the future, and this can in my opinion be accomplished by remitting all taxes upon farming land for a certain number of years, that is, upon such lands as are located in the more remote sections of the country, and including, of course, also the adoption of the double standard of money.

 

 

Page 358.

 

      J.--Do you mean that the present money circulation should be increased by an equal amount of silver?

      Wm.--Oh, no, no! I don’t believe that our money circulation should be increased one dollar, but that a certain amount of silver should be substituted in place of the same amount of gold to be withdrawn from circulation; this, as I said before, would have the effect of causing a more extended circulation of money throughout the country, which again would have the effect of creating a wider field for the distribution of labor. Now, am I not right, Jo?

      Jo.--Yes, I think you are, and the good effects that would result would be only a question of time. But allow me to ask if there do not exist other causes why the sons and daughters of the farmers are so ready to leave their homes and crowd into the towns and cities, besides the desire to make money easier and quicker?

      W.--Oh, yes! Yet these other causes are the effects of the causes before mentioned, for the farmers themselves, the great majority of them, look upon farming as simply a business speculation, and that it is really necessary to make all the money possible in order to make it pay; this kind of farming means hard work for all, and drudgery for the women folks, and to escape from it the only refuge is the city; but that ain’t farming, Jo.

      Jo.--No, it is not. Whilst up in the country I made a visit to a farm house where I often visited in early days, and the old lady had much to say about the desolate appearance of the country now that the younger ones had all left.  “Well,” says she “the farmers themselves are the cause of it all, for all they thought about was what money they could make off the farm, and they didn’t seem to realize that there was any use at all in trying to fix up the place for a pleasant home for the boys and girls, that would induce them to remain with us; our boys have been gone now for many years, and rather than to see the girls worn out with this endless drudgery, I advised them several years ago to go into the village and work in the factory.

      “Oh, yes,” she continued “we have the farm here yet, what there is left of it, but it wouldn’t sell for enough now to pay off the mortgage; do you see yonder the 50-acre lot where we used to raise such crops of corn; it is all covered now with weeds and briars for it has been farmed to death, and just see the poor crows sitting on the fence beyond; they, too, seem to realize the situation,

 

 

Page 359.

 

and every little while they fly over the cornfield and wonder, I suppose, why the boys don’t start to planting corn. I really pity them.” The old lady continued by saying “farming is not now what it was when I was a girl ;then the farmers took pride in fixing up and making the house and grounds attractive, and there was a pleasure then in living upon the old homestead until we children all got married and moved away. Well, I am thankful that my girls didn’t marry farmers; they are not wealthy, they both married mechanics down in the village; they have nice comfortable homes and pretty children; are happy, and I am contented, and I expect that we will soon move down into the village, too, for there is a man here who wants to take the place to work upon shares for a few years, and I guess he can have it as long as he wants it.”

      W.--Yes, the picture you have drawn of that section of the country, Jo, will apply equally as well to others parts of the country, for the great desire to make money by farming has been the ruin of some of our most valuable farming lands. Well, I must leave you now, but please tell me, Jo, why you brought your mining tools with you? Did you expect to strike a lead on the way across the continent?

      Jo.--Well, yes, I thought it possible. How is the bed rock over there under your bank, pitching?

      W.--Yes, but we don’t allow any prospecting or panning around there; call in and see us, Jo, but don’t bring you mining tools along, so good-day.

 

 

 

Transcribed by: Jeanne Sturgis Taylor.

Proofread by Betty Vickroy.


© 2008 Jeanne Sturgis Taylor.

 

 

 

BACK TO ARGONAUTS IN CALIFORNIA PT 1

BACK TO SACRAMENTO COUNTY

BACK TO SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

BACK TO CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE

GOLDEN NUGGET LIBRARY